Will "Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating L..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
1
Ṁ112027
15%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2025 Review resolves in February 2027.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainers is one of the top fifty posts of the 2025 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
Related questions
Related questions
Will "On attunement" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
9% chance
Will "The Leopold Model: Analysis and Reactions" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
9% chance
Will "Awakening" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "OpenAI: Exodus" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "o1: A Technical Primer" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
18% chance
Will "What Goes Without Saying" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
31% chance
Will "Lsusr's Rationality Dojo" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
17% chance
Will "Activation space interpretability may be doomed" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "On the functional self of LLMs" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "That Mad Olympiad" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance