Will Lily Phillips break the record for most sex partners in one day
Basic
22
𝕊181
Mar 1
24%
chance

In 2004, Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 men in a single day, setting the current record. Lily Phillips recently announced her intention to exceed that record

https://x.com/lilyphillip_s/status/1861893961888956787?s=46&t=mqEUzsHObBgl7scl66V10A

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Lily Phillips has sex with 920 or more men in a single day by February 28, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".

If Lily Phillips cancels the attempt, or otherwise schedules the event for a time after February 28, 2025, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "No".

This market will resolve based on the first such attempt made by Lily Phillips.

This market's resolution source is information released by Lily Phillips or her official representatives.

  • Update 2025-16-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Additional Clarifications:

    • The resolution criteria are based solely on Lily Phillips' attempt to exceed the existing record of 919 by reaching 920 or more sex partners in one day by February 28, 2025, 11:59 PM ET.

    • Other claims: Any attempts by others to break the record before Lily Phillips do not alter the resolution criteria for this market.

This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

@LeeBressler what about if someone else claims to have broken the record before she tries - will she have to beat that number?

@vitamind no - see below in comments - discussed yesterday

@LeeBressler thanks - I saw you sold your position so assumed otherwise

@vitamind I did but just trading opportunistically

The good news is that, logistically, the problem here should be at worst an NP-hard reduction to the known optimization problem of "Tip to Tip efficiency". Hardness can sometimes be difficult to establish in this context, and even if you gain proof of NP-hardness, finishing to NP-completion is another matter. It's definitely required to be poly(nomial) by transformation and an efficient (algo)rhythm will need to be demonstrated. And if one-way functions exist (easy to take in one way but hard to go reverse) the whole hardness hierarchy collapses, making the problem of, say, finding a good post-completion PSPACE computationally indistinguishable from a good bounded error probabilistic poly time (and with quantum computers, issues of simultaneous completion). For future research I'd consider permutation group problems, evaluating the hardness of three-player games (Daskalakis and Papadimitriou (2005)), and the difficulties of parallel access to LOGSPACE.

‪How do you even have sex with 920 people in one day‬

‪Assuming you can have sex for 15 hours, you’ll need to have sex with a different partner every minute

the logistics would be a nightmare

bought Ṁ5 NO

I saw a few clips of the dovumentary on 100. It seemd really disorganized and badly managed. Regardless of intentions I dont believe that team is able to manage this logistical nightmare.

I do dislike the going by her word resolution tho.

bought 𝕊3.30 YES

@LeeBressler that’s not lily phillips, tho right?

@ian correct. It’s another British only fans model. I thought it was Phillips for a moment

bought Ṁ10 NO

@LeeBressler For a moment I thought it was a pump and dump, pun coincidental

@TheAllMemeingEye bahahahahahah I was deliriously tired and saw that Twitter post and thought it was her. But then I realized it was a different thot

@LeeBressler The AI summarization in the market description seems have missed the mark at summarizing you.

@Quroe lol

@Quroe fixed

@Quroe @IanPhilips good spotting!

@Quroe I don't see any AI summary 🤔

@TheAllMemeingEye The summary got unalived.

@LeeBressler it's just occurred to me, is the bar for her to beat even higher now then?

@TheAllMemeingEye great q. The question terms specify the number so will stick with that, even though that would no longer be the record… seems unlikely that she will break the old record but fall short of the new one - that would be pretty sad

@TheAllMemeingEye or indeed lower

@JussiVilleHeiskanen what do you mean?

@TheAllMemeingEye think limbo, not high jump

@LeeBressler seems fake, it’s 40 seconds per person

Related questions

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules